Charles Nurse posted on August 31, 2008 13:27

This year was my wife Eileen and my 25th Wedding Anniversary, so we decided to go to Italy for 17 days in June - spending our actual anniversary in Florence.  I decided not to take my laptop with me, so I wasn't able to blog while we were traveling, so I am now taking the opportunity to tell the story of our "Italy 2008" trip.

Today we are going back to the Vatican – this time as tourists.  I have booked a walking tour of the Vatican Museum with “Angel Tours Rome”, another of Rick Steves recommended tour companies.

We retrace the route we took yesterday, catching the metro to the “Ottaviano – San Pietro” station, and walking to St. Peter’s square where we are supposed to meet our tour group.  When we are all gathered, we are split into through groups of about 12 – each with our own guide  - Kenneth – a Scot is out guide.

The tour is wonderful, and Kenneth is very entertaining – sometimes a bit irreverent.  During the tour we “lose” 6 of our group – we get separated during one of the crowded sections – not sure where they went – but they had been concerned about our finish time, as they had another tour to get to.

Vatican
 
Vatican1 Vatican2
Vatican3 Vatican4
Vatican5 Vatican6

 

As we now only 6 people – Kenneth offered to take us on a tour of St. Peters after.  Technically, he was not acredited by St. Peter’s as a tour guide, but with such a small group, we could pass as a group of friends touring the Basilica.

St Peter’s Basilica
 
StPeters6 StPeters7

After our tour of St. Peter’s, Kenneth recommended a local restaurant – off the beaten track – not even in Rick Steves, and we all went there for a lovely traditional Roman lunch of Pasta, Salad and Pizza.  The six of us split the bill, and treated kenneth to lunch as his “tip”.

We were exhausted by then – our 2 and a half hour tour had been 5 hrs, so we headed back to the hotel for a nap, before heading down the Via Nationale for some “shopping”, followed by dinner at Restaurant Target – next door to our hotel.

Useful Links:


Posted in: Travel  Tags: , ,

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Introduction

In a previous article I described the Etymological origins of the surname Nurse.  In this article I will describe my research on the geographical distribution of the name.

There are many references to the name Nurse (or Nourse) in the IGI[1] (International Genealogical Index) for England, with a large number of them in the Somerset and Gloucestershire sections as well as Norfolk and Lincolnshire. However the IGI is not a particularly good source to use for geographical distributions as some counties have much better representation in the Index than others.

The first step in locating the geographical home of a family name is to establish the current distribution. It is surprising how often family names, even after all the mobility of modern times, are still rooted in or near the places where they were first recorded in the Middle Ages. We therefore begin our research with a recent telephone directory for the UK.[2]

A very large majority of homes have telephones, and from a statistical point of view, the distribution of names of telephone subscribers should reflect the distribution of names in the population as a whole. The directory lists 591 entries for the name Nurse, an average of 12 per million population.[3]

Figure 1 Distribution of the Surname Nurse in the 1999 BT Telephone Directory by Postcode

Geographical_Distribution1999

Figure 1 shows the percentage of all the Nurse BT subscribers plotted by Postcode Area (i.e. BS or WC).

PostCode Area might appear to be a curious geographical area to use, but the mapping software only provided modern counties, rather than the historical counties.

There are three areas where the Nurse name is concentrated.

These are:

  • The area around the Wash centred on the Peterborough Postcode (PE) with about 23% (136) of all the Nurse BT subscribers. This corresponds approximately to the historical counties of Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Norfolk and Suffolk. The Peterborough Postcode has the largest concentration of Nurse subscribers – 38 or 6.4%, with Leicester (LE) having 28 or 4.7% and Norwich (NR) having 20 or 3.4%.
  • South Wales with 9.3% (55) of the Nurse subscribers.
  • Bristol and North Somerset with 7.6% (45) of the Nurse subscribers.

Our next step in determining the geographical source of a family name is to use older record sources. One obvious set of sources are the census’ taken between 1841 and 1901, in particular the 1881 census[4] as it is the earliest census to have been digitally indexed[5]. It has been completely transcribed onto CDROM. Figure 2 plots the percentage of Nurses in the 1881 Census, again by Postcode Area.

Figure 2 Distribution of the Nurse Surname from the 1881 Census

Geographical_Distribution1881

It is clear from this census information that two of the three clusters of Nurses were even more evident 120 years ago although even after over a century of increasing mobility, which would tend to average out the distribution, they are still fairly distinct.

In fact, in the 1881 census, only 6 of the 122 Postcode Areas have more than 3% of the total number of Nurses (1461) and these 6 have nearly half of the total number of Nurses. These are:

  • The Peterborough Area (PE) with 197 or 13.4%.
  • Norfolk (NR) with 153 or 10.5%.
  • The Bristol Area (BS) with 115 or 7.9%.
  • Suffolk (IP) with 83 or 5.7%.
  • SE London (SE) with 72 or 4.9%.
  • The Bath and North East Somerset Area (BA) with 68 or 4.7%.

Let’s look at these two regions in more detail, starting with the region surrounding the Wash. Figure 3 shows the Census information plotted by census location (village/town) rather than the larger Postcode Area.

Figure 3 Distribution of the Nurse Surname in the vicinity of the Wash (1881 Census)

Geographical_Distribution1881_Wash

While there are concentrations of Nurses throughout Norfolk, Suffolk and Northern Cambridgeshire, the largest concentrations are centred on King’s Lynn itself. In particular there are four large clusters of Nurses:

  • 48 in and around Dersingham, about 6 miles north east of King’s Lynn
  • 27 in and around West Dereham, about 12 miles slightly east of south of King’s Lynn, and
  • 20 in and around Wisbech to the south west of King’s Lynn
  • 18 in and around Downham Market, about 10 miles slightly west of south of King’s Lynn

In fact of the 350 (23.9%) Nurses in the 1881 Census in the PE and NR postcodes, 179 (12.3%) are located within 15 miles of King’s Lynn, with a further 124 (8.5%) located within 30 miles of King’s Lynn, predominantly to the East of the city. This is fully one fifth of the total number of Nurses in the whole of the British Isles, as counted in the 1881 Census.

Figure 4 Distribution of the Nurse Surname in the vicinity of Bristol (1881 Census)

Geographical_Distribution1881_NorthSomerset

Figure 4 shows a similar distribution for the cluster centred on Bristol and North Somerset. Here there are 3 major concentrations of Nurses:

  • 33 centred on Hanham, Bitton and Oldland,
  • 29 in south west Bristol centred on Bedminster
  • 48 in the area of Somerset between Shepton Mallet, Wells and Glastonbury, centred on North Wooton.

In 1881, most (if not all) of the Nurses in the Hanham/Bitton area are my ancestors and their descendants, as are many of those in the Bedminster area.

To conclude this discussion, we can postulate two scenarios;

  1. the name originated in two locations independently, or
  2. the name originated in one location and a descendant moved to the second location, where the family prospered.

Prior to the national censuses of the 19th century there are no sets of data that are as complete. We are therefore left with these two scenarios.

As mentioned earlier in this section, while the IGI is not a complete survey, there are quite a lot of references to Nurses living in Somerset and Gloucestershire. In particular, there are quite a few references in the IGI to a family living in the parish of Awre, near the Forest of Dean, the earliest mention being the Baptism of a Johes Nurse, son of Robert Nurse on 22nd Feb 1539.[6]

In addition, there are many references in Boyd's Marriage Index, as well as the IGI for Somerset to a family (or families) living in the Parishes of High Ham and Aller, just east of Taunton. One of the earliest references is to the marriage of Elizabeth Nurse to George Dimont in High Ham in 1597.[7]

Since I have been able to trace my Nurse ancestry back to the early 18th century to north Somerset, it is likely that my Nurse line originated somewhere in Somerset or Gloucestershire, most likely the former county.


Bibliography and Notes

[1] - The IGI or International Genealogical Index is a computerised list of genealogical data gathered by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Much of the data is suspect as it has been submitted by members who are keen to “baptise” their ancestors into their faith, and has not been verified independently. However, it does provide a useful jumping off point for genealogical research, as long as one verifies any data. (www.familysearch.org)

[2] 1999 BT Telephone Directory (www.bt.com)

[3] Based on a population in 1999 of 45,726,756

[4] 1881 Census of England & Wales on CDROM, Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints.

[5] The 1901 and more recently the 1891 censuses have been digitally indexed and are available on the Internet. However, the 1881 census is the earliest available, so it was chosen for this analysis.

[6] International Genealogical Index, Rev. Jan 1988, Gloucestershire County, Page 16,867.

[7] Boyd's Marriage Index for Somerset, Society of Genalogists  - www.englishorigins.com


Posted in: Genealogy  Tags: ,

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This year was my wife Eileen and my 25th Wedding Anniversary, so we decided to go to Italy for 17 days in June - spending our actual anniversary in Florence.  I decided not to take my laptop with me, so I wasn't able to blog while we were traveling, so I am now taking the opportunity to tell the story of our "Italy 2008" trip.

We wake up to the alarm this morning. The Papal Audience doesn’t start until 10:30 am, and even though we have “VIP” tickets – courtesy of the Anglican Centre interceding on our behalf with the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, we have been urged to be early as the seats are not reserved.  The Papal Council offices open at 8:30 so allowing for travel time we decide to leave at about 8am.

StPeters1 Its a very hot day today – we catch the Metro from the Repubulica station just round the corner from our hotel to the Ottaviano station, the closest Metro stop to the Vatican. 

The Papal Council’s office is at Via della Consolazione 5 on the 4th floor, but we don’t know which end of the street No 5 is.  Via della Consolazione is the street that leads from the Tiber river up to St Peter’s Square.  As luck would have it – it is of course at the “other” end.

Our contact in the office is a Canadian priest, so we chat briefly about things Canadian. We then make our way back up the street to St. Peter’s square.  When we reach the square, it is cordoned off and we have to show our tickets and go through airport-like security. 

We are directed to seats at the top of the steps, just in front of the basilica.  There are already quite a few people here so we get seats in about the 10th row (out of about 25).

The Papal Audience
 
StPeters2 StPeters3
StPeters4 StPeters5

Its really hot in the square – we get there at about 9am so there is still about an hour and a half to wait – good job we brought our umbrellas – they make good parasols.

The audience starts a few minutes late – its quite an experience as groups are introduced – the Pope even has groupies (groups of teenagers) who chant his name

After about an hour the audience is over, and we head back to the hotel to take a rest in our air-conditioned room – Eileen is afraid she might have sun-stroke.

As I mentioned before, I had to cancel a walking tour of the Colosseum and the Forum in order to go to the audience, so we decide that we should do them this afternoon – after all I have Rick Steves’ audio walking tours on my iPod. 

The Colosseum is one of the attractions on the Roma pass – a 3 day pass that gives 2 free visits and then discounts on further visits for most of the main sites (except the Vatican), as well as a 3 day transit pass, so we head over to the Termini station to pick up the pass, before catching the Metro to the Colosseum stop.

Ancient Rome
   
Rome5 Rome6 Rome7
Rome8 Rome9 Rome10

We spent the next 3 hours wandering around the Colosseum and the Roman Forum.  By the end of our tour in the Forum the shadows were getting quite long.  We finished our tour by climbing the steps up the Capitoline Hill, for some wonderful vistas over the remains of Imperial Rome, before descending the other side of the hill to Piazza Venezia, and the noise of modern Rome..

We wandered up the Via dei Corso looking for somewhere to eat – we find a small cafe in a Piazza off the main street.  After a long day, we catch a bus back to the Piazza Republica and our hotel.

Useful Links:


Posted in: Travel  Tags: , ,

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

In DotNetNuke v 4.6 a new installer system was introduced to handle the new Authentication Systems.  In DotNetNuke 5.0 we have extended the use of the Installer to all extensions, including Modules, Language Packs and Skins.  In previous blogs in this series I introduced the new Extension Installer Manifest, and the 3 components that most developers would be fairly familiar with – Module, Assembly, File, as they are similar to the legacy module manifest.

In this article I will begin to dive deeper into some of the other components, by looking at the Cleanup Component.

For quite a few versions, the core DotNetNuke installer has used the concept of a cleanup file which lists the files and folders that are no longer being used.  This cleanup file is a simple text file eg. 04.09.00.txt is the cleanup file to cleanup files that are no longer used in version 4.9 of the core (see Listing 1).

Listing 1 - The Cleanup file for version 4.9.0 of the DotNetNuke core
' Remove uninstalled module packages that have new versions in distribution. 
Install\Module\Forum_03.20.09_Install.resources 
Install\Module\HTML_04.06.01_Install.zip

More recently, the same concept was introduced into the legacy Module Installer.  Again the convention was used that the cleanup file would be named “version".txt (eg 02.00.00.txt).  This convention required Module developers to include a SqlDataProvider file for each version, regardless of whether there were any changes, as the only way that the legacy installer was aware of a "new" version was whether there was a script file to process.

In the new Extension Installer manifest operations must be explicitly declared, and so there is a Cleanup Component Installer (see Listing 2).

Listing 2 - The Cleanup Component manifest fragment from the BroadcastPollingCachingProvider
   1:  <component type="Cleanup" version="05.00.00">
   2:      <files>
   3:          <file>
   4:              <path>bin</path>
   5:              <name>DotNetNuke.Caching.BroadcastPollingCachingProvider.dll</name>
   6:          </file>
   7:      </files>
   8:  </component>

Those of you who have read the previous blog post will notice that this components schema is very similar to the schema for the File component.  (Actually many of the other component manifest schema are similar to the File component and this is demonstrated by the fact that the Coponent Installer classes sub-class the FileInstaller component).

If you have a lot of files to remove the new Cleanup Component provides an alternative method similar to the legacy method.  If the fileName attribute is specified the Cleanup component uses an external file.

Listing 3 - The Cleanup Components alternate style
   1:  <component type="Cleanup" version="05.00.00" fileName="05.00.00.txt" />

While you can use a cleanup file in the same way as the legacy installer, there is still one difference.  Unlike the legacy installer which uses a file naming convention and requires you to have a script file with the same version number, the Cleanup Component requires you to explicitly reference the file, the name can be anything you want, and there is no requirement for a script file with the same version number.


Posted in: DotNetNuke  Tags: , ,

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Charles Nurse posted on August 28, 2008 06:25

This year was my wife Eileen and my 25th Wedding Anniversary, so we decided to go to Italy for 17 days in June - spending our actual anniversary in Florence.  I decided not to take my laptop with me, so I wasn't able to blog while we were traveling, so I am now taking the opportunity to tell the story of our "Italy 2008" trip.

Today we are off to Rome, our last stop - got up early and headed down to breakfast - Noella wasn't ready - she was used to us coming down later.  By the time we had settled with Noella and packed it was ~9:30am. 

Our original plan was to drop the car at Orvieto, but we did discus driving all the way to Rome.  In the end, my fear of Rome traffic won out, and we headed for Orvieto – about 2 hrs drive from Val d’Orcia.

When we got to Orvieto we found the Hertz drop-off fairly easy and walked across the street to the station.  We bought our tickets and caught the 11:58 express to Rome.  The train arrived at about 1:10pm and we walked to the hotel - Bellesuite Roma.  It was ~10 mins walk.  We had considered taking the Metro for one stop, but thought that the hassles would not be worth it, and we found the hotel easily.  The Hotel is very nice and air conditioned.

After we left Canada (while we were in Florence), Bishop Michael (Eileen works as Assistant to the Anglican Bishop of New Westminster) contacted us to say he had arranged tickets for the Papal Audience (tomorrow) through the Anglican Center in Rome.

I had arranged a walking tour of the Forum and Colosseum the next morning, so I phone the tour company to see if we could rearrange it for another day.  Unfortunately, they were completely booked so we canceled the tour - I hadn't prepaid - so we could attend the Papal Audience for the experience. 

We knew we had to pick up the tickets the next morning, but we weren't sure where to get them, so we headed for the Anglican Center (it is a couple of blocks from the Pantheon).  The director's wife made us a lovely cup of tea - how English (although the Director and his wife were from Australia - he had previously been Dean of Melbourne) - and we chatted about "Anglican affairs"  The receptionist at the center - an Episcopal priest  from the States- phoned her contact at the Vatican to find out the exact details and so we were all set for tomorrow.

Rome - Pantheon, Trevi Fountain and Spanish Steps
Rome1 Rome2
Rome3 Rome4

After leaving the Anglican Center, we did a little sight-seeing between the showers, visiting the Pantheon, the Trevi Fountain and the Spanish Steps, before returning to our hotel and dinner at the Target Restaurant at the end of our street – another Rick Steves suggestion.  Back in the hotel after dinner, I was able to watch some more Euro 2008 Football.  This time I had a choice of watching it in Italian on RAI or in German.

Useful Links:


Posted in: Travel  Tags: ,

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

 Search Blog

 Adsense

 Calendar

«  January 2009  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678
View posts in large calendar

 Recent Posts

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2009 Thoughts from the Wet Coast